A B2B Channel-Threat?
In June 2019, Amazon introduced a new B2B brand: AmazonCommercial. The first items in the line? T&T! (For more search AmazonCommercial at AMZ).
What’s Amazon thinking? Amazon Business has gotten traction with a “long-tail”, MRO/SKU strategy specifically aimed at huge entities. AMZ has attracted an army of resellers to curate millions of B2B SKUs. And, in parallel, AMZ has created two cloud solutions: integrations for 60+ internal procurement systems, and free, central-spend-management tools. This evolving proposition now wins up to 20% of a typical big-buyer’s MRO spend.
AMZ’s next B2B moves? Target some bulky, big-volume, consumable, SKU? All employers do buy T&T… but how price-competitive can AMZ be? Or, conversely, how net-profitable are T&T for distributors?
A Distributor’s T&T, Net-Profit Math
Checking with a “Jan-San” distributor who subscribes to Waypoint Analytics’ “Net-Profit Analytics” cloud-service, here’s what we found:
- The distributor breaks even overall on warehouse business. Direct sales account for all operating profits.
- The 7000+ warehouse SKUs were sorted into 100+ product categories.
- Ranking the product categories by net-profits: the top 25 totaled big profits, enough to pay for 100% of all losing product groups.
- The biggest losing category was equipment parts. The category has an excellent margin percentage. But, the many small-dollar picks have less margin-dollar content than the fulfillment-dollar costs to yield losses. The size of both picks/orders and fulfillment costs matter.
- Two of the top 5 most net-profitable categories were T&T! The categories’ low margin percentages were more than offset by large, average-dollars/pick.
- No big customers have yet to negotiate with AMZ T&T prices.
Questions to Live Into:
- What will Amazon invent for in-the-cloud buying tools, bulk-distribution capabilities, and/or business-model partnerships, to win more B2B spend? And, more B2B searches and clickstream data to monetize via advertising?
- Why are legacy channel players blind to the net-profit/loss cross-subsidies that exist amongst both SKUs and customers?
- Won’t both AMZ and big-boxes introduce more private-label clone SKUs to eat into channels’ most net-profitable SKUs?
- Will channel players beat AMZ to inventing an in-the-cloud, channel-model for skid-quantity consumables? (I can envision such a game-changing model.)
- What analytics do factories and distributors need to minimize AMZ’s takes while maximizing gains from slow-moving, traditional competitors?
For more, be in touch: email@example.com. Waypoint clients can also attend my Nov 7th workshop. Link below: